Structural Engineers

 
Home | Demolition & Renovation engine | Finite Element Analysis engine | Material Dynamics engineering | Moment Frame & Shear Wall engi | Seismology engineering | Soil mechanics engineering | Structural engineering other t | Welding, Bonding & Fastener en
  Position:Home>Soil mechanics engineering>Article Content
Topping Slab for Mat Foundation
Source:Internet Author:Unknow Pubdate:2010-07-10  
smwa (Structural) 22 Jun 10 21:19
Hi All,

I'm designing a mat foundation with a 5" topping slab. The topping slab is added so the architect can depress the finish elevation for walk-off mats and restroom tiles, and also coloring the topping slab w/o coloring the entire mat.  

My question is: Should the topping slab be poured directly on the mat foundation, or should there be a slip plane between the two, so the topping slab can shrink as it cures.

If the topping slab is poured directly on the mat, should I provide more contraction joints than the typical 15ft spacing I use for slab-on-grade?

Thanks in advance,

SMWA

hokie66 (Structural) 23 Jun 10 2:19
There should be a slip plane between the structural and non-structural slabs.  Plastic sheets are often used.  Is there a membrane under the mat?  If so, be careful about too many vapour barriers. 字串4

smwa (Structural) 23 Jun 10 12:52
Thanks for your response hokie66.  Yes, there will be a 10mm vapor barrier under the mat foundation.

SMWA

hokie66 (Structural) 23 Jun 10 17:21
10mm vapor barrier?  That's thick.  What's it made of?  Is it a membrane against hydrostatic pressure?

I'm not knowledgeable about vapor transmission, but would consult with someone who is before you sandwich the mat between two impervious surfaces.

smwa (Structural) 23 Jun 10 17:41
hokie66,

Sorry, I meant 10 mil vapor barrier.  
I guess the vapor barrier under the mat slab is unnecessary if there is a vapor barrier between the topping slab & the mat.  Would there be any reason to have a vapor barrier under the  mat? 字串3

Thanks,

SMWA

hokie66 (Structural) 23 Jun 10 17:55
I doubt there is a reason for a vapor barrier under the mat, but there may be need for a membrane.  Big difference.

structuresguy (Structural) 29 Jun 10 13:08
I would put the vapor retarder (the 10mil product, which should not be called barriers because they are not barriers) between the mat and the topping.  Reason being is that it is more likely to be damaged during construction of the mat, due to heavy rebar stands, vibrators, etc...  No reason I can see to have it below the mat, heck it might even be under water in that case, depending on your water table height.  Here in florida that could definitely be a problem, and a standard 10mil vapor retarder with taped seems would in no way be "water proof".  So i think it would be more effective and less prone to damage over the mat.

字串5



(Click:
Previous:Grond bearing slab and flexible pavement to American codes   Next:Nothing
[Add TO Favorites] [TOP] [PRINT] [CLOCE WINDOWS]  
  Hot Article
·Friction between soil and r/f
·Pile Soil Spring Constant
·Light Pole Foundation
·Soil Bearing Capacity for N-Va
·soil lateral surchage pressure
·How to analize the lateral for
·Equivalent fluid pressure
·Spread Footing OT moment SF
·Coefficients of subgrade react
·seismic parameters to UBC 97
·Jib Crane Foundation
·Mat Footing with uplift
  Related Articles
·Curve Info
·draw bearing using AutoCad
·IF THERE IS EASY WAY
·Newbie S6 robotic control layo
·Problem with Nikon DTM 332
·Offset of CST/berger universal
·survey calculations
·Using same control point for m
·Accurate Distance Measurement
·Trimble Geomatics Office &
·ArcGIS SDK
·Nikon AC-2s
MBT SHOES CLEARANCE SALE Cheap LouisVuitton Bags Civil / Environmental Engineers Structural Engineers Aeronautic Engineers Automotive Engineers Chemical Engineers Geotechnical Engineers Industrial / Manufacturing Engineers Materials Engineers Computer Engineers Agricultural Engineers Mechanical Engineers Petroleum Engineers Bioengineers Military Engineers